15es Jornades Imatge i Recerca. 2018


Survey to the participants in the 15th Image and Research Conference 2018

Image and Research Conference
Centre for Image Research and Diffusion

There are 14 questions in this survey.
  A note on privacy
This survey is anonymous.
The record kept of your survey responses does not contain any identifying information about you unless a specific question in the survey has asked for this. If you have responded to a survey that used an identifying token to allow you to access the survey, you can rest assured that the identifying token is not kept with your responses. It is managed in a separate database, and will only be updated to indicate that you have (or haven't) completed this survey. There is no way of matching identification tokens with survey responses in this survey.
 

Survey

 Marking scale:  (1 - Poor) (2 - Not very good) (3 - Average) (4 - Good) (5 - Very good)


Has the symposium lived up to your expectations?
Do the subjects dealt with interest you?
How do you rate the presentations / sessions?
  1 2 3 4 5 No answer
Integrity of digital images
Crowdsourcing in the archive: adding value to photographic archives using gamification
Challenges and innovation in voice recognition. Channel 9 as a case study
Fonds and photographic collections of the Moreira Salles Institute
Conservation works at Televisa collection
Mission and objectives of the Montevideo Photography Center (CDF)
The digitization of color negatives in the perspective of archival fonds
30 years of photographic collections management. A projection towards the future
Discussion space. In the search of new audiences
Which papers / forums of experiences did you find most interesting? (Remember this applies only to the presentations given on Friday afternoon)
What subjects do you think would be interesting for future editions?
As regards the place, how do you rate:
  1 2 3 4 5 No answer
Comfort
Acoustics
Resources
Do you think the information prior to the Symposium was adequate?
How do you rate the organization during the Symposium?
Do you think the symposium lasted the right amount of time?
Do you think the distribution of time (timetables) was good?
Have you attended previous editions?
What is your professional field?
Choose one of the following answers

Remarks / suggestions